现在有很多的高利息的银行, 大多是网上银行居多. 把闲钱存到利息高的银行应该是不错,但是我们常忽略了在转账过程中丢失的时间,常常2-7天不等. 在这段期间,我们是拿不到利息的.
我们打个比方,小明有$1000从3% 转到3.2% , 转账要4天时间,那么各位看官, 通过小学的加减乘除, 会发现一个事实, 小明在第一个月损失了$1.86. 他至少要在3.2%的银行中存上59天, 才会弥补上转账的4天时间.
听上去有些复杂,不过大家可以使用下面的在线计算工具:
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
银行转账利息比较
Friday, August 10, 2007
The (Bureaucratic) Enviro Wars in China intensify...
Posted by Bill Powell
You can get a sense of the bureaucratic infighting within the Chinese government over the need for stronger environmental protection versus the need for continued strong economic growth in the following dispatch, which notes that the government has postponed “indefinitely” the release of the latest “green” GDP figures (for the year 2005). The 2004 report estimated the “cost” of pollution at 3.1 per cent of China’s GDP.A lot of bureaucrats and party leaders—particularly at the provincial level—wish the enviros would get out of their hair. They believe China’s priority still has to be economic growth first second and third. China cannot—no country really has—square this circle (that is, move to protect the environment more energetically without imposing serious costs on the economy.) Optimists note that in the post war period, the United States, Japan and South Korea among others all moved from being environmental basket cases to being relatively green (certainly compared to China) within a relatively short amount of time. The difference of course, is that China is still mainly a developing country—it’s still got massive numbers of people that it needs to move out of relative poverty to, at minimum, lower middle class status. That’s very different from where Japan and South Korea and the United States were when they started cleaning up on a significant scale; ergo, the serious political tension in China on the subject of the environment. My own sense is that the stresses, and arguments, are much more intense on this subject than many believe. It’s becoming a real fault line within the Chinese political system. Watch this space.Herewith the link to the Worldwatch institute report on this subject:
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5266
You can get a sense of the bureaucratic infighting within the Chinese government over the need for stronger environmental protection versus the need for continued strong economic growth in the following dispatch, which notes that the government has postponed “indefinitely” the release of the latest “green” GDP figures (for the year 2005). The 2004 report estimated the “cost” of pollution at 3.1 per cent of China’s GDP.A lot of bureaucrats and party leaders—particularly at the provincial level—wish the enviros would get out of their hair. They believe China’s priority still has to be economic growth first second and third. China cannot—no country really has—square this circle (that is, move to protect the environment more energetically without imposing serious costs on the economy.) Optimists note that in the post war period, the United States, Japan and South Korea among others all moved from being environmental basket cases to being relatively green (certainly compared to China) within a relatively short amount of time. The difference of course, is that China is still mainly a developing country—it’s still got massive numbers of people that it needs to move out of relative poverty to, at minimum, lower middle class status. That’s very different from where Japan and South Korea and the United States were when they started cleaning up on a significant scale; ergo, the serious political tension in China on the subject of the environment. My own sense is that the stresses, and arguments, are much more intense on this subject than many believe. It’s becoming a real fault line within the Chinese political system. Watch this space.Herewith the link to the Worldwatch institute report on this subject:
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5266
Let the Games Begin...
Posted by Bill Powell
We’re now one year away from Olympics 08, and, as if responding to the crack of a starting gun, a group of prominent dissidents in China have come out of the blocks with a tough, open letter calling for “universal human rights” in China. Herewith the letter from “Chinese Human Rights Defenders (who are identified below.) This will be be an interesting year.
>
One World, One Dream, Universal Human Rights.
The letter is addressed to Chinese leaders and leaders in the concerned international community, proposing seven measures to end human rights abuses surrounding the preparations for the Olympics and calling forAmnesty of prisoners of conscience. Chinese Human Rights Defenders stands with those who signed the letter, supporting their position on the Beijing Olympics and the seven proposals.Jacques Rogge, Chair of the International Olympic Committee, is in Beijing to attend a two-day ceremony to mark the one-year count-down.Beijing police has intensified "clean-up" operations, rounding up petitioners and putting some activists under close watch.More than forty people signed the Open Letter, including Dai Qing, the well-known writer/journalist, Bao Tong, a former top aid to Zhao Ziyang, the reformist former Chinese leader, Ding Zilin, who has led the Tiananmen Mothers movement, and Liu Xiaobo, the famous dissident writer.The letter is open for endorsement by any Chinese citizens and members of the international community. The following is the Open Letter in English:"One World, One Dream" and Universal Human RightsAn Open Letter to Chinese and World Leaders on the 2008 Beijing Olympics.Hu Jintao, President, People's Republic of China Wu Bangguo, Chair, Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of ChinaWen Jiabao, Premier of the State Council of ChinaJacques Rogge, Chair, International Olympic CommitteeDoru Romulus Costea, President, United Nations Human Rights CouncilLouise Arbour, High Commissioner, United Nations Office for Human Rights
Leaders of democratic states concerned about promoting freedom and human rights International NGOs concerned with human rights; members of the communities of sports, arts and entertainment, academe, and business around the world.Respected Leaders and Fellow World Citizens:Upholding the fundamental principles of the Olympic spirit, including "respect for universal fundamental ethical principles" and "the harmonious development of man, with a view to promoting a peaceful societyconcerned with the preservation of human dignity" (Olympic Charter, Preamble); Taking note of the Chinese government's official 2008 Olympic theme"One World, One Dream" and the Beijing Olympic Committee's stated objectives of hosting an "Open, Green, and Humane Olympics"; and mindful of the growing number of questions and criticisms in our own society and from around the world about the violations of the human rights of Chinese citizens in the name of the Beijing Olympics We, the undersigned citizens of the People's Republic of China, here voice our concerns and to propose changes in the ways in which our government is handling its preparations for the Olympics.Today, August 8, 2007, marks the start of the one-year count-down to the 2008 Summer Olympics, a mega-event for China and the world. We, as citizens of the People's Republic of China, ought to be feeling pride in our country's glory in hosting the Games, whose purposes include the symbolization of peace, friendship, and fairness in the world community. We also ought to feel uplifted by the watchword chosen by the Beijing Olympic Committee: "One World, One Dream." Instead we feel disappointment and doubt as we witness the continuing systematic denial of the human rights of our fellow citizens even while--and sometimes because--Olympic preparations are moving forward. We hear "One World" and wonder: What kind of world will this be? "One Dream"?Whose dream is it that is coming true? We are gravely concerned about the question of whether authorities in our country can successfully host the Olympic Games in an authentic Olympic spirit so that the 2008 Beijing games can become an event of which China and the world community can be proud.As the one world that we share "globalizes," lives and dreams are becoming increasingly intertwined. One person's "world dream," especially if it is implemented with unchecked power, and with endorsement from theworld community, can turn into misery and nightmare for others. "One world" can still be a world where people suffer discrimination, political and religious persecution, and deprivation of liberty, as well as poverty, genocide, and war. Millions of people who survived such miseries and disasters in the 20 the century have come to appreciate, and to pursue, human rights.Universal human rights have become the bedrock concept in pursuing lasting peace, sustainable development, and justice. If "one dream" is truly to belong to all cultures and communities it must involve protection of basic rights and liberties for all. Even the powerful, the rich and privileged might be punished unjustly tomorrow if fundamental rights are not assured today. The government that rules our country has pledged to the Chinese people and to the world to protect human rights. It has acceded to obligations under numerous international human rights conventions and treaties,including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and it has amended the Chinese Constitution to include guarantees of human rights. In order to avoid misunderstanding, and in order to alert the international community to un-Olympic conduct that tarnishes the true spirit of the Games, we, the undersigned citizens of the People's Republic of China, endorse the government's Olympic slogan with the following vital addition: "One World, One Dream, and Universal Human Rights."*Without promoting human rights, which are the fundamental principle of universal ethics in China and elsewhere, it is gratuitous to promote "One World." Without the protection of the human rights of all Chinesecitizens equally--i.e., without abolition of the rural-urban residential control system, without an end to discrimination against women and sexual, ethnic, and faith minorities, and without ending the suppression of political dissent--it is senseless to talk about "One Dream" for all of China. China's government has promised the International Olympic Committee to "promote human rights" and has pledged to the United Nations Human Rights Council to "uphold the highest standard of human rights." On paper it has taken certain steps toward improving human rights--in 2003, for example, abolishing the arbitrary detention system known as "Custody and Repatriation" and in 2004 adding "human rights protection" as an amendment to China's Constitution. We believe that the government should be able to do much more.Little has been done, in practice, to carry out the promises that have been made on paper. On the contrary we have experienced and witnessed violations of human rights many times--in press censorship and control of the Internet, in the persecution of human rights defenders and of people who expose environmental or public health disasters, in the exploitation of poor or disadvantaged social groups and in retaliation against them when they protest, and even in abuses by corrupt officials who are involved in the construction of Olympic facilities and city beautification projects that are aimed to prepare for the Olympics. All of these actions violate not only international standards but provisions of the Chinese constitution as well.We find no consolation or comfort in the rise of grandiose sports facilities, or a temporarily beautified Beijing city, or the prospect of Chinese athletes winning medals. We know too well how these glories are built on the ruins of the lives of ordinary people, on the forced removal of urban migrants, and on the sufferings of victims of brutal land grabbing, forced eviction, exploitation of labor, and arbitrary detention.Out of deep affection for our motherland and our sense of duty as citizens of the world, we will do our best, and urge leaders in China and in the world community to join hands with us, to make the Beijing Olympics a turning point in China's rise to greatness. China has the opportunity to use the Games to build true harmony on the basis of respect for human dignity and freedom and to become a respectable member of the community of civilized nations--not by loud rhetoric or brute force, but by taking actions to promote human rights at home and in the world.In the "one world" in which we live, the dreams that are coming true in China today will significantly shape everyone's future. Therefore, in order to promote a successful Olympics consistent with human rights, we propose the following measures:1. Declare amnesty for all prisoners of conscience so that they can enjoy the Olympic games in freedom.2. Open China's borders to all Chinese citizens who have been forced into exile for their beliefs, expression, or faith, so that they can re-unite with their loved ones and celebrate the glory of the Olympics in their motherland;3. Implement the government ordinance to allow foreign journalists to conduct interviews and reporting without pre-approval by authorities before October 17, 2008, granting Chinese journalists the same access and independence.4. Provide fair compensation to the victims of forced evictions and land appropriations that have been done in order to construct Olympic facilities, and release people who have been detained or imprisoned (often violently) for protesting or resisting such actions.5. Protect the rights of workers on all Olympic construction sites, including their right to organize independent labor unions; end discrimination against rural migrant laborers and give them fair compensation. 6. End police operations intended to intercept, detain, or send home petitioners who try to travel to Beijing to complain about local officials' misconduct; abolish illegal facilities used for incarcerating, interrogating, and terrorizing petitioners; end the "clean up” operations aimed at migrants that demolish their temporary housing and close down schools for their children.7. Establish a system of citizen oversight over Olympics spending and provide public accounting and independent auditing of Olympics-related expenditures; make the process of awarding contracts to businesses transparent, and hold legally accountable any official who embezzles or wastes public funds. We further suggest setting up an independent Beijing Olympics Watch Committee, composed of independent experts and representatives of non-governmental organizations and affected communities such as migrant laborers and people who have been forcibly relocated. This Committee would oversee the implementation of the above proposals. It should be allowed to operate independently, to examine plans, to interview freely, and to release its findings to the public. Citizen participation is key to a successful Olympics.If proposals even as straightforward as the foregoing cannot be adopted, we feel certain that the Beijing Olympics will not go down in history as the glorious events that everyone wishes them to be. We do not want to "politicize" the Olympic movement. However, pushing the Games through in ways that violate human rights and that hurt people who are forced into silence, all in the name of a "dream" that belongs only to "some" people, not our whole world, will only plant seeds of resentment that will exacerbate the crises in China and affect the future of the world.
Sincerely yours,Signed (name followed by location of residence and profession):DING Zilin, Beijing, professor, leader of "TiananmenMothers"LIU Xiaobao, Beijing, writer, president of independentChinese PENBAO Zhunxin Beijing, historianYU Haocheng, Beijing, legal scholarDAI Qing, Beijing, writer/journalistBAO Tong, Beijing, former member of CCP CentralCommittee JIANG Peikun , Beijing, professorZHANG Xianling, Beijing, engineer, leading member of"Tiananmen Mothers"JIANG Qisheng, Beijing, scientist/writerCHEN Ziming ,Beijing, scholarZHANG Zhuhua,Beijing, ScholarLIAO Yiwu, Sichuan, writerWANG Yi, Sichuan, scholarJIAO Guobiao, Beijing, scholar/writerCHEN Xiaoya, Beijing, scholar/writerLIU Junning, Beijing, scholarXU Youyu, Beijing, scholar at Chinese Academy of SocialScienceHE Weifang, Beijing, professor, Beijing UniversityXIA Yeliang Beijing, economistAI Xiaoming, Guangzhou, professorZHANG Hong Shanghai, professorYU Jie Beijing, writerYU Shichun Beijing, scholar/writerMA Bo Beijing, writerFU Guoyong, Zhejiang, writerRANG Yunfei Sichuan, writerGAO Yu Beijing, journalistZAN Aizong, Zhejiang, journalistPU Zhiqiang Beijing, lawyerTENG Biao Beijing, lawyerZHUANG Daohe Zhejiang, lawyerXIA Lin Beijing, lawyerHU Jia, Beijing, independent activistWEN Kejian, Zhejiang, writerZHAO Dagong, Shenzhen, writerQIN Geng,Hainan, writerWANG Debang, Beijing, writer
If you wish to support the position and the seven proposals stated in this open letter, please send you name, country or city of residency affiliation or profession, to networkcrd@gmail.com.
Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) is a non-political, non-government network of grassroots and international activists promoting human rights protection and empowering grassroots activism in China.
We’re now one year away from Olympics 08, and, as if responding to the crack of a starting gun, a group of prominent dissidents in China have come out of the blocks with a tough, open letter calling for “universal human rights” in China. Herewith the letter from “Chinese Human Rights Defenders (who are identified below.) This will be be an interesting year.
>
One World, One Dream, Universal Human Rights.
The letter is addressed to Chinese leaders and leaders in the concerned international community, proposing seven measures to end human rights abuses surrounding the preparations for the Olympics and calling forAmnesty of prisoners of conscience. Chinese Human Rights Defenders stands with those who signed the letter, supporting their position on the Beijing Olympics and the seven proposals.Jacques Rogge, Chair of the International Olympic Committee, is in Beijing to attend a two-day ceremony to mark the one-year count-down.Beijing police has intensified "clean-up" operations, rounding up petitioners and putting some activists under close watch.More than forty people signed the Open Letter, including Dai Qing, the well-known writer/journalist, Bao Tong, a former top aid to Zhao Ziyang, the reformist former Chinese leader, Ding Zilin, who has led the Tiananmen Mothers movement, and Liu Xiaobo, the famous dissident writer.The letter is open for endorsement by any Chinese citizens and members of the international community. The following is the Open Letter in English:"One World, One Dream" and Universal Human RightsAn Open Letter to Chinese and World Leaders on the 2008 Beijing Olympics.Hu Jintao, President, People's Republic of China Wu Bangguo, Chair, Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of ChinaWen Jiabao, Premier of the State Council of ChinaJacques Rogge, Chair, International Olympic CommitteeDoru Romulus Costea, President, United Nations Human Rights CouncilLouise Arbour, High Commissioner, United Nations Office for Human Rights
Leaders of democratic states concerned about promoting freedom and human rights International NGOs concerned with human rights; members of the communities of sports, arts and entertainment, academe, and business around the world.Respected Leaders and Fellow World Citizens:Upholding the fundamental principles of the Olympic spirit, including "respect for universal fundamental ethical principles" and "the harmonious development of man, with a view to promoting a peaceful societyconcerned with the preservation of human dignity" (Olympic Charter, Preamble); Taking note of the Chinese government's official 2008 Olympic theme"One World, One Dream" and the Beijing Olympic Committee's stated objectives of hosting an "Open, Green, and Humane Olympics"; and mindful of the growing number of questions and criticisms in our own society and from around the world about the violations of the human rights of Chinese citizens in the name of the Beijing Olympics We, the undersigned citizens of the People's Republic of China, here voice our concerns and to propose changes in the ways in which our government is handling its preparations for the Olympics.Today, August 8, 2007, marks the start of the one-year count-down to the 2008 Summer Olympics, a mega-event for China and the world. We, as citizens of the People's Republic of China, ought to be feeling pride in our country's glory in hosting the Games, whose purposes include the symbolization of peace, friendship, and fairness in the world community. We also ought to feel uplifted by the watchword chosen by the Beijing Olympic Committee: "One World, One Dream." Instead we feel disappointment and doubt as we witness the continuing systematic denial of the human rights of our fellow citizens even while--and sometimes because--Olympic preparations are moving forward. We hear "One World" and wonder: What kind of world will this be? "One Dream"?Whose dream is it that is coming true? We are gravely concerned about the question of whether authorities in our country can successfully host the Olympic Games in an authentic Olympic spirit so that the 2008 Beijing games can become an event of which China and the world community can be proud.As the one world that we share "globalizes," lives and dreams are becoming increasingly intertwined. One person's "world dream," especially if it is implemented with unchecked power, and with endorsement from theworld community, can turn into misery and nightmare for others. "One world" can still be a world where people suffer discrimination, political and religious persecution, and deprivation of liberty, as well as poverty, genocide, and war. Millions of people who survived such miseries and disasters in the 20 the century have come to appreciate, and to pursue, human rights.Universal human rights have become the bedrock concept in pursuing lasting peace, sustainable development, and justice. If "one dream" is truly to belong to all cultures and communities it must involve protection of basic rights and liberties for all. Even the powerful, the rich and privileged might be punished unjustly tomorrow if fundamental rights are not assured today. The government that rules our country has pledged to the Chinese people and to the world to protect human rights. It has acceded to obligations under numerous international human rights conventions and treaties,including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and it has amended the Chinese Constitution to include guarantees of human rights. In order to avoid misunderstanding, and in order to alert the international community to un-Olympic conduct that tarnishes the true spirit of the Games, we, the undersigned citizens of the People's Republic of China, endorse the government's Olympic slogan with the following vital addition: "One World, One Dream, and Universal Human Rights."*Without promoting human rights, which are the fundamental principle of universal ethics in China and elsewhere, it is gratuitous to promote "One World." Without the protection of the human rights of all Chinesecitizens equally--i.e., without abolition of the rural-urban residential control system, without an end to discrimination against women and sexual, ethnic, and faith minorities, and without ending the suppression of political dissent--it is senseless to talk about "One Dream" for all of China. China's government has promised the International Olympic Committee to "promote human rights" and has pledged to the United Nations Human Rights Council to "uphold the highest standard of human rights." On paper it has taken certain steps toward improving human rights--in 2003, for example, abolishing the arbitrary detention system known as "Custody and Repatriation" and in 2004 adding "human rights protection" as an amendment to China's Constitution. We believe that the government should be able to do much more.Little has been done, in practice, to carry out the promises that have been made on paper. On the contrary we have experienced and witnessed violations of human rights many times--in press censorship and control of the Internet, in the persecution of human rights defenders and of people who expose environmental or public health disasters, in the exploitation of poor or disadvantaged social groups and in retaliation against them when they protest, and even in abuses by corrupt officials who are involved in the construction of Olympic facilities and city beautification projects that are aimed to prepare for the Olympics. All of these actions violate not only international standards but provisions of the Chinese constitution as well.We find no consolation or comfort in the rise of grandiose sports facilities, or a temporarily beautified Beijing city, or the prospect of Chinese athletes winning medals. We know too well how these glories are built on the ruins of the lives of ordinary people, on the forced removal of urban migrants, and on the sufferings of victims of brutal land grabbing, forced eviction, exploitation of labor, and arbitrary detention.Out of deep affection for our motherland and our sense of duty as citizens of the world, we will do our best, and urge leaders in China and in the world community to join hands with us, to make the Beijing Olympics a turning point in China's rise to greatness. China has the opportunity to use the Games to build true harmony on the basis of respect for human dignity and freedom and to become a respectable member of the community of civilized nations--not by loud rhetoric or brute force, but by taking actions to promote human rights at home and in the world.In the "one world" in which we live, the dreams that are coming true in China today will significantly shape everyone's future. Therefore, in order to promote a successful Olympics consistent with human rights, we propose the following measures:1. Declare amnesty for all prisoners of conscience so that they can enjoy the Olympic games in freedom.2. Open China's borders to all Chinese citizens who have been forced into exile for their beliefs, expression, or faith, so that they can re-unite with their loved ones and celebrate the glory of the Olympics in their motherland;3. Implement the government ordinance to allow foreign journalists to conduct interviews and reporting without pre-approval by authorities before October 17, 2008, granting Chinese journalists the same access and independence.4. Provide fair compensation to the victims of forced evictions and land appropriations that have been done in order to construct Olympic facilities, and release people who have been detained or imprisoned (often violently) for protesting or resisting such actions.5. Protect the rights of workers on all Olympic construction sites, including their right to organize independent labor unions; end discrimination against rural migrant laborers and give them fair compensation. 6. End police operations intended to intercept, detain, or send home petitioners who try to travel to Beijing to complain about local officials' misconduct; abolish illegal facilities used for incarcerating, interrogating, and terrorizing petitioners; end the "clean up” operations aimed at migrants that demolish their temporary housing and close down schools for their children.7. Establish a system of citizen oversight over Olympics spending and provide public accounting and independent auditing of Olympics-related expenditures; make the process of awarding contracts to businesses transparent, and hold legally accountable any official who embezzles or wastes public funds. We further suggest setting up an independent Beijing Olympics Watch Committee, composed of independent experts and representatives of non-governmental organizations and affected communities such as migrant laborers and people who have been forcibly relocated. This Committee would oversee the implementation of the above proposals. It should be allowed to operate independently, to examine plans, to interview freely, and to release its findings to the public. Citizen participation is key to a successful Olympics.If proposals even as straightforward as the foregoing cannot be adopted, we feel certain that the Beijing Olympics will not go down in history as the glorious events that everyone wishes them to be. We do not want to "politicize" the Olympic movement. However, pushing the Games through in ways that violate human rights and that hurt people who are forced into silence, all in the name of a "dream" that belongs only to "some" people, not our whole world, will only plant seeds of resentment that will exacerbate the crises in China and affect the future of the world.
Sincerely yours,Signed (name followed by location of residence and profession):DING Zilin, Beijing, professor, leader of "TiananmenMothers"LIU Xiaobao, Beijing, writer, president of independentChinese PENBAO Zhunxin Beijing, historianYU Haocheng, Beijing, legal scholarDAI Qing, Beijing, writer/journalistBAO Tong, Beijing, former member of CCP CentralCommittee JIANG Peikun , Beijing, professorZHANG Xianling, Beijing, engineer, leading member of"Tiananmen Mothers"JIANG Qisheng, Beijing, scientist/writerCHEN Ziming ,Beijing, scholarZHANG Zhuhua,Beijing, ScholarLIAO Yiwu, Sichuan, writerWANG Yi, Sichuan, scholarJIAO Guobiao, Beijing, scholar/writerCHEN Xiaoya, Beijing, scholar/writerLIU Junning, Beijing, scholarXU Youyu, Beijing, scholar at Chinese Academy of SocialScienceHE Weifang, Beijing, professor, Beijing UniversityXIA Yeliang Beijing, economistAI Xiaoming, Guangzhou, professorZHANG Hong Shanghai, professorYU Jie Beijing, writerYU Shichun Beijing, scholar/writerMA Bo Beijing, writerFU Guoyong, Zhejiang, writerRANG Yunfei Sichuan, writerGAO Yu Beijing, journalistZAN Aizong, Zhejiang, journalistPU Zhiqiang Beijing, lawyerTENG Biao Beijing, lawyerZHUANG Daohe Zhejiang, lawyerXIA Lin Beijing, lawyerHU Jia, Beijing, independent activistWEN Kejian, Zhejiang, writerZHAO Dagong, Shenzhen, writerQIN Geng,Hainan, writerWANG Debang, Beijing, writer
If you wish to support the position and the seven proposals stated in this open letter, please send you name, country or city of residency affiliation or profession, to networkcrd@gmail.com.
Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) is a non-political, non-government network of grassroots and international activists promoting human rights protection and empowering grassroots activism in China.
What US Consumers Think of Chinese Products Now...
Posted by Bill Powell
Political leaders everywhere—whether elected or unelected (as in China) --obviously care about public opinion. In this Olympic year, China’s leaders are arguably more attuned to foreign perceptions of their country than ever before. They should thus be interested in the following survey results from John Zogby, who runs a well known polling shop in the US. It’s a detailed poll about US consumers' reaction to Chinese products in the wake of many of the recent quality scandals that Chinese suppliers have suffered. The results speak for themselves:
Zogby Poll: 82% concerned about buying goods from China . Survey finds that while 69% believe non-food products from China are safe, just 30% are as confident about food imported from China . The recent warnings and recalls about toxic toothpaste, tainted pet food, contaminated seafood and lead paint-laced toys from China haven't gone unnoticed by American consumers - the vast majority of Americans (82%) said they are concerned about purchasing goods from China in the wake of many media reports about faulty goods from that country, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows. The survey was conducted before the announcement of a massive recall of Chinese-made toys by Fisher-Price, but after a significant recall of Chinese-made railroad toys sold under the Thomas & Friends Wooden Railway brand name. Both companies recalled the products because they contained excessive levels of lead on the toys and parts. Despite media reports raising safety concerns about Chinese goods, 69% said they are confident the non-food products they purchase from China are safe - but 20% aren't so sure. Asked about their confidence in the safety of food products from China, 59% said they are not confident that foods from China are safe to eat. Just 30% said they are confident the food products they purchase from China are safe, while 12% said they were unsure, the online survey shows. These findings are included in the August issue of Zogby's American Consumer newsletter, which focuses on how Americans feel about imported goods, product safety, food labeling and many other issues and is available now at www.zogby.com . The Zogby Interactive survey of 4,508 adults nationwide was conducted July 17-19, 2007 and carries a margin of error of +/- 1.5 percentage points. Other findings from the nationwide survey include: * Nearly two-thirds (63%) said they would be likely to participate in a boycott of Chinese goods until the country implements stricter safety regulations. * 61% said they would be more likely to purchase a product with a "China Free" label. * 86% believe cost is the primary motivator for most American consumers. * One in three respondents would be willing to pay four times as much for a made-in-America children's toy. Another 42% would be more likely to purchase a toy shipped in from overseas because of the cost savings. * When tainted goods and unsafe products make their way to U.S. shelves, 37% blame foreign manufacturers and 30% say U.S. import companies are most at fault. Another 17% believe the U.S. government isn't doing enough to stop these items from entering the country, while 7% believe foreign governments are to blame. While some Chinese leaders have claimed the U.S. is exaggerating the problems with Chinese goods in order to discredit them as a trading partner, 72% discount this claim. Americans are split over how seriously the Chinese government is taking reports of recent safety recalls of products imported to the U.S. from China. While 45% believe the Chinese government is taking the recalls seriously, 46% remain skeptical. China has pledged to take steps to tighten regulations on its food processors, while claiming its exports are safe - but many Americans (51%) are unconvinced. But 43% believe China will take the appropriate steps to significantly reduce the country's food safety issues. The vast majority (89%) believes the U.S. government should put stronger pressure on China and other foreign countries to increase product quality and safety standards, while nearly as many (85%) would support the U.S. government imposing stronger criminal penalties and fines on U.S. importers who allow dangerous products to be imported from foreign countries. Half (49%) of the respondents in this latest Zogby Interactive poll said they will continue to buy products from China while 43% said it is not very likely or not at all likely they will continue to buy Chinese products. Whatever shoppers' intentions, following through could be a challenging task. We asked respondents how difficult they would expect it to be to not buy items from China for one week, given their typical shopping habits and the prevalence of products from China currently in the U.S. market place - 53% said they would expect avoiding the purchase of Chinese goods to be a difficult task, while slightly less (43%) don't believe it would be a problem. For a detailed methodological statement on this survey, the link is here :http://www.zogby.com/methodology/readmeth.dbm?ID=1204 ">http://www.zogby.com/methodology/readmeth.dbm?ID=1204
Political leaders everywhere—whether elected or unelected (as in China) --obviously care about public opinion. In this Olympic year, China’s leaders are arguably more attuned to foreign perceptions of their country than ever before. They should thus be interested in the following survey results from John Zogby, who runs a well known polling shop in the US. It’s a detailed poll about US consumers' reaction to Chinese products in the wake of many of the recent quality scandals that Chinese suppliers have suffered. The results speak for themselves:
Zogby Poll: 82% concerned about buying goods from China . Survey finds that while 69% believe non-food products from China are safe, just 30% are as confident about food imported from China . The recent warnings and recalls about toxic toothpaste, tainted pet food, contaminated seafood and lead paint-laced toys from China haven't gone unnoticed by American consumers - the vast majority of Americans (82%) said they are concerned about purchasing goods from China in the wake of many media reports about faulty goods from that country, a new Zogby Interactive poll shows. The survey was conducted before the announcement of a massive recall of Chinese-made toys by Fisher-Price, but after a significant recall of Chinese-made railroad toys sold under the Thomas & Friends Wooden Railway brand name. Both companies recalled the products because they contained excessive levels of lead on the toys and parts. Despite media reports raising safety concerns about Chinese goods, 69% said they are confident the non-food products they purchase from China are safe - but 20% aren't so sure. Asked about their confidence in the safety of food products from China, 59% said they are not confident that foods from China are safe to eat. Just 30% said they are confident the food products they purchase from China are safe, while 12% said they were unsure, the online survey shows. These findings are included in the August issue of Zogby's American Consumer newsletter, which focuses on how Americans feel about imported goods, product safety, food labeling and many other issues and is available now at www.zogby.com . The Zogby Interactive survey of 4,508 adults nationwide was conducted July 17-19, 2007 and carries a margin of error of +/- 1.5 percentage points. Other findings from the nationwide survey include: * Nearly two-thirds (63%) said they would be likely to participate in a boycott of Chinese goods until the country implements stricter safety regulations. * 61% said they would be more likely to purchase a product with a "China Free" label. * 86% believe cost is the primary motivator for most American consumers. * One in three respondents would be willing to pay four times as much for a made-in-America children's toy. Another 42% would be more likely to purchase a toy shipped in from overseas because of the cost savings. * When tainted goods and unsafe products make their way to U.S. shelves, 37% blame foreign manufacturers and 30% say U.S. import companies are most at fault. Another 17% believe the U.S. government isn't doing enough to stop these items from entering the country, while 7% believe foreign governments are to blame. While some Chinese leaders have claimed the U.S. is exaggerating the problems with Chinese goods in order to discredit them as a trading partner, 72% discount this claim. Americans are split over how seriously the Chinese government is taking reports of recent safety recalls of products imported to the U.S. from China. While 45% believe the Chinese government is taking the recalls seriously, 46% remain skeptical. China has pledged to take steps to tighten regulations on its food processors, while claiming its exports are safe - but many Americans (51%) are unconvinced. But 43% believe China will take the appropriate steps to significantly reduce the country's food safety issues. The vast majority (89%) believes the U.S. government should put stronger pressure on China and other foreign countries to increase product quality and safety standards, while nearly as many (85%) would support the U.S. government imposing stronger criminal penalties and fines on U.S. importers who allow dangerous products to be imported from foreign countries. Half (49%) of the respondents in this latest Zogby Interactive poll said they will continue to buy products from China while 43% said it is not very likely or not at all likely they will continue to buy Chinese products. Whatever shoppers' intentions, following through could be a challenging task. We asked respondents how difficult they would expect it to be to not buy items from China for one week, given their typical shopping habits and the prevalence of products from China currently in the U.S. market place - 53% said they would expect avoiding the purchase of Chinese goods to be a difficult task, while slightly less (43%) don't believe it would be a problem. For a detailed methodological statement on this survey, the link is here :http://www.zogby.com/methodology/readmeth.dbm?ID=1204 ">http://www.zogby.com/methodology/readmeth.dbm?ID=1204
So Farewell, Then, Chinese River Dolphin
The amazing thing about the Chinese river dolphin is not its extinction so much as the fact that it has survived this long at all. It simply beggars belief that a sensate mammal was able to inhabit that viscous spillway of heavy metals, sewage and other toxins that goes by the name of the Yangtze River—but the poor things hung on grimly. In 2002, there were around a hundred of them struggling through the muck. In 2005, their numbers were estimated at 13. This year, we have bid a casual ciao to the remaining few cetaceans. According to a recently published study, we’ve killed them all off.
Following hard in their wake are the white dolphins of the China coast (sometimes called “pink dolphins” because the presence of tiny blood vessels near the skin’s surface gives them a distinctive tint). The government has labeled them a "national key protected species," which is to say they are doomed. The last significant population – some estimates put it at 200, others as low as 65 – lives in Hong Kong waters. Given the amount of maritime traffic, that’s the equivalent of trying to bed down on a six-lane highway. People sometimes go on dolphin-spotting tours: it must be a Sisyphean experience.
A few years ago, the pink dolphin was a favorite subject of Hong Kong children's drawings, but the little ones don’t bother now. Perhaps one day they’ll stop drawing trees and coloring the sky blue. I don’t mean to get all sententious on you, but the Chinese river dolphin is the first large vertebrate to become extinct in fifty years, and the gaps between extinctions, in all likelihood, are going to be a lot shorter from now on.
Following hard in their wake are the white dolphins of the China coast (sometimes called “pink dolphins” because the presence of tiny blood vessels near the skin’s surface gives them a distinctive tint). The government has labeled them a "national key protected species," which is to say they are doomed. The last significant population – some estimates put it at 200, others as low as 65 – lives in Hong Kong waters. Given the amount of maritime traffic, that’s the equivalent of trying to bed down on a six-lane highway. People sometimes go on dolphin-spotting tours: it must be a Sisyphean experience.
A few years ago, the pink dolphin was a favorite subject of Hong Kong children's drawings, but the little ones don’t bother now. Perhaps one day they’ll stop drawing trees and coloring the sky blue. I don’t mean to get all sententious on you, but the Chinese river dolphin is the first large vertebrate to become extinct in fifty years, and the gaps between extinctions, in all likelihood, are going to be a lot shorter from now on.
Curing the China Cough
In one week Beijing expects to have some clearer skies and emptier streets. This is by far the best news I’ve heard recently, even better than someone telling me the price of pork is going to go down.
Officials announced yesterday that from August 17 to 20, almost half of Beijing's 3 million cars will be banned from driving. During these four days, cars with odd numbered plates will be allowed on the roads on Aug. 17 and 19, while even numbered plates get Aug. 18 and 20. (Police, emergency, embassy and public transit vehicles are exempt.)
Some 1.3 million cars will come off the street, putting the total closer to what it was like when I came to Beijing five years ago. Beijing’s automobile exhaust level was much lower then. Now, according to People Daily online, the city has become “the biggest car exhaust emission area in the world.”
Beijing always had sandstorms. But in the “good old days,” as long as I struggled through to spring, the air was generally good from May until the next winter. I used to feel spoiled to have so many clear and often sunny days up in Beijing, especially coming from the country's south, where it can rain for weeks on end.
But now, a recently arrived colleague from Hong Kong suffers from a chronic cough. An intern from the U.S. got a cold two weeks into the Beijing summer. My boss's wife coughed for months after arriving from Malaysia. I rode my bike last winter for two weeks and started coughing. The China Cough, like an infectious disease, spreads easily.
So when the news about the temporary car ban came out, I began to picture the blue sky I've been missing. Government officials say that it will be a test to see the extent to which car exhaust contributes to the poor air quality in Beijing. It will be a challenge for the city’s public transportation system to handle hundreds of thousands of additional passengers. But if that works out, Beijing needs to do this more often.
Officials announced yesterday that from August 17 to 20, almost half of Beijing's 3 million cars will be banned from driving. During these four days, cars with odd numbered plates will be allowed on the roads on Aug. 17 and 19, while even numbered plates get Aug. 18 and 20. (Police, emergency, embassy and public transit vehicles are exempt.)
Some 1.3 million cars will come off the street, putting the total closer to what it was like when I came to Beijing five years ago. Beijing’s automobile exhaust level was much lower then. Now, according to People Daily online, the city has become “the biggest car exhaust emission area in the world.”
Beijing always had sandstorms. But in the “good old days,” as long as I struggled through to spring, the air was generally good from May until the next winter. I used to feel spoiled to have so many clear and often sunny days up in Beijing, especially coming from the country's south, where it can rain for weeks on end.
But now, a recently arrived colleague from Hong Kong suffers from a chronic cough. An intern from the U.S. got a cold two weeks into the Beijing summer. My boss's wife coughed for months after arriving from Malaysia. I rode my bike last winter for two weeks and started coughing. The China Cough, like an infectious disease, spreads easily.
So when the news about the temporary car ban came out, I began to picture the blue sky I've been missing. Government officials say that it will be a test to see the extent to which car exhaust contributes to the poor air quality in Beijing. It will be a challenge for the city’s public transportation system to handle hundreds of thousands of additional passengers. But if that works out, Beijing needs to do this more often.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
A Chinese Regulator Sentenced to Die 郑筱萸
A Chinese Regulator Sentenced to Die
By Simon Elegant / Beijing
By Simon Elegant / Beijing
For a Vice-Minister accustomed to running a branch of China's government as his own virtual fiefdom (an estate of land, especially one held on condition of feudal service), the sentence must have come as a surprise. On Tuesday, a Beijing court handed down a death penalty for Zheng Xiaoyu, the former head of the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA), after he was convicted of dereliction of duty(shameful failure to fulfil one's obligations.) and accepting some $850,000 in bribes, according to local media reports. But while the severity of the sentence wasn't completely unprecedented(never having happened before)・several senior officials have been executed for corruption in recent years including a deputy minister in 2000・it was still a shocking illustration of how seriously Beijing took his crimes. While Beijing has cracked down on official corruption over the past 18 months, with several other senior officials caught up in the dragnet(a systematic search for criminals ), all of those arrested so far have received prison terms or still await sentencing. Hao Heping, another former official at the Food and Drug Administration, only received 15 years in prison for bribery in November last year.
Zheng, who was arrested in December, may to some extent be a victim of bad timing: Beijing is being bombarded( to attack sb. for a long time ) with criticism at home and abroad for its sometimes-fatal inability to regulate its food and medical industries. Chinese citizens have been inundated (to receive so much of something that you cannot easily deal with it all) with news stories about fake drugs and poisoned food products in recent years. In 2006, six people died and scores of others became ill after taking a contaminated antibiotic. Several years earlier, 300 babies fell gravely ill and more than a dozen died of malnutrition after being fed fake milk powder which had found its way onto market shelves. Indeed, the same day Zheng's verdict was announced, China's main quality control agency, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, announced it was launching its first recall system for unsafe food products, expected to be up and running by the end of the year.
Even worse for Zheng, China's regulatory problems have extended beyond the country's borders. More than 100 people in Panama were killed by Chinese-made cough medicine last year; in March, Chinese-made pet food ingredients containing the chemical melamine sickened or killed an untold number of animals and led to the recall of some 100 brands of pet food. With the world's spotlight is on Chinese efforts to improve its record on food safety, there's little doubt that the pressure of international embarrassment and death and illness at home added to the severity of Zheng's sentence.
But before you start feeling too sorry for Zheng, it's worth remembering that even in a country inured (to make someone become used to something unpleasant) to reports of official venality (corruption ), his case is particularly egregious(extremely bad and noticeable). Zheng almost singlehandedly supervised China's drug industry for over a decade before his retirement in 2005. Through astute (＝ clever) bureaucratic maneuvering(use strategy to gain an objective), he managed to have the SFDA removed from the supervision of the Ministry of Health in 2003, after which it became a powerful agency in its own right・leaving it effectively under his sole control. According to Xinhua, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court said Zheng "sought benefits" for eight pharmaceutical companies by approving their drugs and medical devices. His actions "greatly undermined the integrity and the efficiency of China's drug monitoring and supervision, endangered public life and health and had a very negative social impact," the report quoted the court as saying. (It's unclear if Zheng will appeal.) Officials say the country's pharmaceutical industry is now in disarray(lack of order); many of the SFDA's senior officials are under arrest or investigation and virtually all previous decisions are being reviewed, leading to confusion and paralysis (the loss of the ability to move ). It may take years to sort out the mess created during Zheng's long tenure・and there will no doubt be further illnesses and deaths from tainted food and contaminated drugs in the meantime.
My comment:
It is really both good and bad news for me. The negative fact is there are still many officials corrupting to the core, and the sentence of Zheng may have very limited effects for them who are ignoring all laws and rules. Though Zheng’s sentence is a positive sign for the government to really be aware of the situation and deal it properly. The biggest challenge is how to handle millions of cases of venality and dereliction of duty and try to gain back the trust and confidences of normal citizens. According to conficus, the most respected Chinese philosopher, there are two aspects to achieve success in managing a country, good economy, strong defense, and the confidence of people. (足食，足兵，民信 -论语·颜渊)
Maybe, the problem is inherent in the initial developing stage of every country. The transformation of last 30 years in China took more than 100 year somewhere else. The speed of social economic transformation outpaces the regulatory system. The problem will go away naturally after the mature of economic and political system. I still don’t know the answer of the Chinese government yet. However, I believe Beijing will take the effective strategy to handle the crisis, as it also did for the last 50 years, during which we faced much more severe crisis coming from home and outside.
Monday, July 9, 2007
how to enable google ads in Office Spaces
To fix the problem, Create a new html page and put the JavaScript code in it. Upload the page to your documents directory
In the HTML module on your page put an IFRAME and bring up the HTML page in that IFRAME.
An IFRAME is like a window embedded in your page in which you can show another Web page. Here is how to add one to your pages:Add an HTML module to your page Right-click anywhere in the module and click Properties on the pop up menu Add the following code
< src="http://ThePageYouWantToShow.htm" width="10" height="10" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0"> < /iframe>
Replace the URL with the URL of the page you want to show. delete one space imidiately after<. Save and close the "Properties" box When you get back to your Web page in the Page Editor, you should see the IFRAME populated with the page whose URL you entered. When you setup your account, now is time to open your ads account. You can click the button on the bottom of my page or goto https://w ww.google.com/adsense.
In the HTML module on your page put an IFRAME and bring up the HTML page in that IFRAME.
An IFRAME is like a window embedded in your page in which you can show another Web page. Here is how to add one to your pages:Add an HTML module to your page Right-click anywhere in the module and click Properties on the pop up menu Add the following code
< src="http://ThePageYouWantToShow.htm" width="10" height="10" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0"> < /iframe>
Replace the URL with the URL of the page you want to show. delete one space imidiately after<. Save and close the "Properties" box When you get back to your Web page in the Page Editor, you should see the IFRAME populated with the page whose URL you entered. When you setup your account, now is time to open your ads account. You can click the button on the bottom of my page or goto https://w ww.google.com/adsense.
Sunday, July 8, 2007
setup free blog or webpage to run google ads (adsense)
How to setup a free blog or website to run google ads?
The era of google ads (adsense) affects almost every webpage , for better or worse. Now individual bloggers and website masters can make money by run google ads.
There are many free web pages online. However, you should know only few can support google ads or other ads. The criteria to run google ads is to support Java. Here we list four competitors, two from google family and two from Microsoft family.
1) Google’s page creator. free web page space with 100MB of storage and unspecific bandwidth limit. Unofficially it was said 100MB/ per month. Sign up at http://pages.google.com .
2) Google blogger. Free blog service with excellent possibility of website design. You can pick up a template or customize webpage very very easily. Even I, an architect without any web techniques can design a comfortable blogger in only 1 hour. It is also works great with google ads. You just need to click several button to run ads. The only problem is that google’s blogger can’t be accessed in China. Some your friends in China can’t admire your interesting blog or share your feeling. Sign up @ http://www.blogger.com/
You can look at example @ http://luyi12.blogspot.com
3) Microsoft’s Live spaces. It is an alternative choice to blogger and adsense. It runs its own ads company named Kanoodle. The ads service can be turned on by clicking others in module windows. The design possibility is limited and I don’t like inferface at all. Live spaces is also slower than blog according to my test. The bright side is you can connect with your Chinese friends here. You can look at my site for a glimpse @ http://dee-pad.spaces.live.com/
4) Mricrosoft’s Office Live, provides 500M free space with bandwidth of 20G/month. It doesn’t support google ads. However here is the trick to enable google ads.
When you setup your account, now is time to open your ads account. You can click the button on the bottom of my page or goto https://w ww.google.com/adsense.
Basic speaking, how to setup a free blog or website to support google ads is relatively easy. Even through to attract people to your website is really difficult. And let people clicking your ads is more chanllenging.
Last but not least, the earnings of either google ads or kanoodle for live spaces totally depends. It is not comparable. Some people report higher earning from kanoodle, some reported just the opposite. Good luck, everyone, including myself on the new game with google.
The era of google ads (adsense) affects almost every webpage , for better or worse. Now individual bloggers and website masters can make money by run google ads.
There are many free web pages online. However, you should know only few can support google ads or other ads. The criteria to run google ads is to support Java. Here we list four competitors, two from google family and two from Microsoft family.
1) Google’s page creator. free web page space with 100MB of storage and unspecific bandwidth limit. Unofficially it was said 100MB/ per month. Sign up at http://pages.google.com .
2) Google blogger. Free blog service with excellent possibility of website design. You can pick up a template or customize webpage very very easily. Even I, an architect without any web techniques can design a comfortable blogger in only 1 hour. It is also works great with google ads. You just need to click several button to run ads. The only problem is that google’s blogger can’t be accessed in China. Some your friends in China can’t admire your interesting blog or share your feeling. Sign up @ http://www.blogger.com/
You can look at example @ http://luyi12.blogspot.com
3) Microsoft’s Live spaces. It is an alternative choice to blogger and adsense. It runs its own ads company named Kanoodle. The ads service can be turned on by clicking others in module windows. The design possibility is limited and I don’t like inferface at all. Live spaces is also slower than blog according to my test. The bright side is you can connect with your Chinese friends here. You can look at my site for a glimpse @ http://dee-pad.spaces.live.com/
4) Mricrosoft’s Office Live, provides 500M free space with bandwidth of 20G/month. It doesn’t support google ads. However here is the trick to enable google ads.
When you setup your account, now is time to open your ads account. You can click the button on the bottom of my page or goto https://w ww.google.com/adsense.
Basic speaking, how to setup a free blog or website to support google ads is relatively easy. Even through to attract people to your website is really difficult. And let people clicking your ads is more chanllenging.
Last but not least, the earnings of either google ads or kanoodle for live spaces totally depends. It is not comparable. Some people report higher earning from kanoodle, some reported just the opposite. Good luck, everyone, including myself on the new game with google.
Can Yi JIanlian Learn to Love Brauts and Beer?
Posted by Bill Powell Comments (4) Permalink Trackbacks (0) Email This
I don't want to say I feel sorry for Yi Jiianlian, the Chinese basketball star who was just the sixth pick in the NBA draft--the guy after all will soon be a multi, multi millionaire--but he's obviously depressed at the thought of playing in Milwaukee for the Bucks, the team that picked him. There are apparently just 27,500 Asian Americans who live in the metro area. The NBA rumor mill has Yi's agent already working on a deal that would send him to the Golden State Warriors, which would obviously make him MUCH happier, or perhaps to the Philadelphia 76ers. Anyway, here's Yi responding to a question at a post draft press conference about where he was drafted. The lack of enthusiasm couldn't be more obvious.
Q: There have been media reports saying you’re not too interested in the Milwaukee Bucks, but with this outcome what do you think you’re going to do. Are you going to request being traded off or are you going to stay on with this team?
A: I don’t really know much about the Milwaukee Bucks, I didn’t get to see a lot of their games in China, neither have I been to their city, which is why I don’t really know much about this team. I haven’t seen their training nor have we been in contact, so I’m not too sure yet. I will certainly be focusing on the China National Team.
I don't want to say I feel sorry for Yi Jiianlian, the Chinese basketball star who was just the sixth pick in the NBA draft--the guy after all will soon be a multi, multi millionaire--but he's obviously depressed at the thought of playing in Milwaukee for the Bucks, the team that picked him. There are apparently just 27,500 Asian Americans who live in the metro area. The NBA rumor mill has Yi's agent already working on a deal that would send him to the Golden State Warriors, which would obviously make him MUCH happier, or perhaps to the Philadelphia 76ers. Anyway, here's Yi responding to a question at a post draft press conference about where he was drafted. The lack of enthusiasm couldn't be more obvious.
Q: There have been media reports saying you’re not too interested in the Milwaukee Bucks, but with this outcome what do you think you’re going to do. Are you going to request being traded off or are you going to stay on with this team?
A: I don’t really know much about the Milwaukee Bucks, I didn’t get to see a lot of their games in China, neither have I been to their city, which is why I don’t really know much about this team. I haven’t seen their training nor have we been in contact, so I’m not too sure yet. I will certainly be focusing on the China National Team.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)